Lex

Browse

GenresShelvesPremiumBlog

Company

AboutJobsPartnersAffiliates

Resources

DocsInvite FriendsSupport

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policygeneral@lex-books.com(215) 703-8277

© 2026 LexBooks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) (No. 609)

1920

Supreme Court of the United States

PDF
Read

Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) (No. 609)

Supreme Court of the United States

1920

Case name: Missouri v. Holland Opinion filed: 1920-04-19 Docket No.: 609 Citations: • 252 U.S. 416 • 40 S. Ct. 382 • 64 L. Ed. 641 • 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1520 Case holding summaries: • upholding Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 40 Stat. 755 (1918 • upholding Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 40 Stat. 755 (1918), pursuant to congressional power to implement treaties, and describing migratory birds as a "national interest of very nearly the first magnitude" since they are both "a food supply" and "the protectors of our forests and our crops" • noting that a treaty may override the power of states over "the great body of private relations," and holding valid a treaty regulating the treatment of migratory birds that travel within the borders of states • holding that Congress can act beyond its enumerated powers in Article I when implementing a treaty obligation • “If the treaty is valid there can be no dispute about the validity of the statute under Article 1, Section 8, as a necessary and proper means to execute the powers of the Government.” • referring to the protection of migratory birds as “a national interest of very nearly the first magnitude” • foreign affairs power allows federal government to regulate by treaty even subjects traditionally falling within state jurisdiction • stating that Congress can act beyond its enumerated Article I powers when implementing a treaty obligation • reasoning that, while "the great body of private relations usually fall within the control of the State, ... a treaty may override its power" • referring to the protection of migratory birds as “a national interest of very nearly the first magnitude” • upholding, against state’s tenth amendment chal­ lenge, federal statute that executed a treaty protecting migratory birds • federal treaty power is not checked by any “ invisible radiation from the general terms o f the Tenth Amendment” • "No doubt the great body of private relations usually fall within the control of the State, but a treaty may overrid

Internet Archive

Case name: Missouri v. Holland Opinion filed: 1920-04-19 Docket No.: 609 Citations: • 252 U.S. 416 • 40 S. Ct. 382 • 64...

X-Ray

Scans1
Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) (No. 609)
Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) (No. 609)
Internet Archive · Scanned pages
PDF