Lex

Browse

All GenresBookshelvesFree BooksFree Audiobooks

Company

About usJobsShare with friendsAffiliates

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Contact

Supportgeneral@lex-books.com(215) 703-8277

© 2026 LexBooks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Carter and Phillips

Famous Quotes

View all 2 quotes

“We are here for a finite amount of time...it's up to each of us to make that time meaningful and special.””

“The administration’s rationale for launching a pre-emptive war against another nation boiled down to three reasons, all of which are proving to be dubious:• Iraq and terrorism. As it is turning out, Saddam Hussein was no real threat to America. And, according to two of the highest-ranking leaders of al-Qaeda currently in U.S. custody, he had no major links to the terrorist organization, or to the September 11 attacks.• He had weapons of mass destruction. According to published reports, when the C.I.A. evaluations of the potential Iraqi nuclear threat weren’t, well, threatening enough, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had Pentagon intelligence units re-interpret the evidence to make it more frightening. (Where’s Jayson Blair when you need him?) And in The Sunday Times of London, Phillip Knightley reported that the pre-war findings of the British intelligence unit M.I.6 were rewritten by the Blair government to make them “more exciting” and, therefore, a more useful tool in the prime minister’s argument for war.• Saddam be bad. Yes, of course he was bad. But if the presence of oppressive regimes is an adequate rationale for going to war, we’re going to be busy for a long time. When do we invade Liberia? Congo? Zimbabwe? Ivory Coast? New York City?””

Vanity Fair 100 Years: From the Jazz Age to Our Age

“We are here for a finite amount of time...it's up to each of us to make that time meaningful and special.””

“The administration’s rationale for launching a pre-emptive war against another nation boiled down to three reasons, all of which are proving to be dubious:• Iraq and terrorism. As it is turning out, Saddam Hussein was no real threat to America. And, according to two of the highest-ranking leaders of al-Qaeda currently in U.S. custody, he had no major links to the terrorist organization, or to the September 11 attacks.• He had weapons of mass destruction. According to published reports, when the C.I.A. evaluations of the potential Iraqi nuclear threat weren’t, well, threatening enough, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had Pentagon intelligence units re-interpret the evidence to make it more frightening. (Where’s Jayson Blair when you need him?) And in The Sunday Times of London, Phillip Knightley reported that the pre-war findings of the British intelligence unit M.I.6 were rewritten by the Blair government to make them “more exciting” and, therefore, a more useful tool in the prime minister’s argument for war.• Saddam be bad. Yes, of course he was bad. But if the presence of oppressive regimes is an adequate rationale for going to war, we’re going to be busy for a long time. When do we invade Liberia? Congo? Zimbabwe? Ivory Coast? New York City?””

Vanity Fair 100 Years: From the Jazz Age to Our Age

Books from the author

right arrow
Nick Carter Stories No. 139, May 8, 1915: The Pressing Peril

More authors like this

right arrow
Laura Lee Hope
Unknown
Victor Appleton
Unknown
Alexandre Dumas
Alexandre Dumas
1802-1870
Anthony Trollope
Anthony Trollope
1815-1882
Arthur Conan Doyle
Arthur Conan Doyle
1859-1930
Charles Dickens
Charles Dickens
1812-1870
Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron Lytton
Edward Bulwer Lytton, Baron Lytton
1803-1873
Edward Stratemeyer
Edward Stratemeyer
1862-1930
G. A. Henty
G. A. Henty
1832-1902
Georg Ebers
Georg Ebers
1837-1898
George Manville Fenn
George Manville Fenn
1831-1909
George Meredith
George Meredith
1828-1909
George Sand
George Sand
1804-1876
Gilbert Parker
Gilbert Parker
1862-1932
Guy de Maupassant
Guy de Maupassant
1850-1893
H. G. Wells
H. G. Wells
1866-1946