Abélard, Tome II
1845
In the medieval schools of Paris, a war of ideas burned over one question: do abstract concepts like "humanity" or "redness" exist in some platonic realm, or are they merely names we slap onto collections of individual things? This was the Problem of Universals, and it split philosophers into warring camps for centuries. Charles de Rémusat's second volume turns his incisive mind to Peter Abelard, the 12th-century thinker whose brilliance and scandal made him the most famous intellectual of his age. Abelard dared to stake out a middle position between the Realists who believed universals were timeless entities and the Nominalists who dismissed them as mere words, and his moderate conceptualism would shape philosophy for generations. Rémusat reconstructs the intellectual milieu of Abelard's Paris: the scholastic method in its infancy, the rediscovery of Aristotle, the theological stakes of seemingly abstract questions. This is not a dry treatise but a lively reconstruction of how serious thinkers once argued about the architecture of reality itself. For anyone curious about where modern philosophy came from, this volume offers a window into the forge where Western thought was being hammered out.
Editions
X-Ray
“People naturally despise a dependant.””
— Charles de Rémusat
“Every one is expected to look out for himself here. I fancy that there would be very little rising if men were expected to rise for the sake of others, in America.””
— Charles de Rémusat
“…in Altruria every one works with his hands, so that the hard work shall not all fall to any one class; and this manual labor of each is sufficient to keep the body in health, as well as to earn a living. After the three, hours’ work, which constitutes a day’s work with us, is done, the young people have all sorts of games and sports, and they carry them as late into life as the temperament of each demands.””
— Charles de Rémusat






