Debating the Holocaust

DEBATING THE HOLOCAUSTA NEW LOOK AT BOTH SIDESTHE CONTROVERSY THAT WON'T GO AWAYNOW, THE TRUTH BEHIND THE'¿¿HOLOCAUST DENIAL'¿¿ DEBATEThere was no budget.There was no plan.There was no extermination order from Hitler.Preeminent Holocaust expert Raul Hilberg said: '¿¿What beganin 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance,not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprintand there was no budget for destructive measures. [Thesemeasures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thuscame about not so much a plan being carried out, but anincredible meeting of minds, a consensus '¿¿ mind reading by afar-flung bureaucracy.'¿¿Is this really a comprehensible explanation?Key camps have all but vanished. So too the human remains.Material evidence is astonishingly absent. The allegedgassing procedure has serious, unanswered questions. Andthe famous '¿¿six million'¿¿ number has an amazing history.Revisionists claim that the public has been seriously misledby traditional historians. Are they right?IF WE COULD BE MISTAKIEN ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST,WHAT ELSE COULD WE BE WRONG ABOUT?