Responsoria Bipartita, Sive Vindiciae suspensionis Ecclesiasticae ut et Presbyterii Evangelici. A double Reply, containing a Vindication of the an- tient practice of the Church (according to the rule of the word) suspending the ignorant and scandalous from the Lords Sup- per. As also of Ecclesiastical Presbyteries as the subject of Church Government. The first in answer to one M. Boatmans challenge of all the Ministers on earth to make suspension of any but Turks, Jews, Pagans and excommunicate persons from the Lords Supper, appear from Scripture. In answer to whom the said censure is justified by several arguments from Scripture, and the universal practice of the Church, the Magisterial vanity also of his Sermon, Decem.13. and March 28. in Peters Church in Norwich is discovered, by anim- adversions on each. In which Answer also some objections of Erastus, Mr. Prin, and Mr. Humfry, are collaterally considered, and answered. The second part in answer to Theophilus Brabourn, who hath tal
Responsoria Bipartita, Sive Vindiciae suspensionis Ecclesiasticae ut et Presbyterii Evangelici. A double Reply, containing a Vindication of the an- tient practice of the Church (according to the rule of the word) suspending the ignorant and scandalous from the Lords Sup- per. As also of Ecclesiastical Presbyteries as the subject of Church Government. The first in answer to one M. Boatmans challenge of all the Ministers on earth to make suspension of any but Turks, Jews, Pagans and excommunicate persons from the Lords Supper, appear from Scripture. In answer to whom the said censure is justified by several arguments from Scripture, and the universal practice of the Church, the Magisterial vanity also of his Sermon, Decem.13. and March 28. in Peters Church in Norwich is discovered, by anim- adversions on each. In which Answer also some objections of Erastus, Mr. Prin, and Mr. Humfry, are collaterally considered, and answered. The second part in answer to Theophilus Brabourn, who hath tal
Details
- OL Work ID
- OL32965902W