Lex

Browse

GenresShelvesPremiumBlog

Company

AboutJobsPartnersSell on LexAffiliates

Resources

DocsInvite FriendsFAQ

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policygeneral@lex-books.com(215) 703-8277

© 2026 LexBooks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Going negativeGoing negative

Going negative

Shanto Iyengar, Stephen Ansolabehere

About this book

Drawing on both laboratory experiments and the real world of America's presidential, gubernatorial, and congressional races, the authors show that negative advertising drives down voter turnout - in some cases dramatically - and that political consultants intentionally use ads for this very purpose. In the 1992 presidential election, by the authors' calculation, over 6 million votes were lost to negative campaigns. Negative ads work better for Republicans than for Democrats, and better for men than for women; unfortunately, negative ads also work better in general than positive ones, so attacking has become nearly universal. Republican primary campaigns increasingly set the tone for our national general elections, and they do so with relentless attacks. Everyone, even a war hero like Colin Powell, is fair game, and few reputations can emerge unscathed. . The result of such a bitter contest is that independent voters, who are disproportionately well educated and open minded, are repulsed by the entire system and have been converted to non-voting apathetics. We are losing some of our best citizens, and pandering to the extremists who remain.

Details

OL Work ID
OL3738834W

Subjects

ElectioneeringPolitical campaignsPolitical AdvertisingNegativismAdvertisingElections & referendaPolitical campaigning & advertisingPolitical ScienceGovernment - U.S. GovernmentPolitics / Current EventsUnited StatesPolitics/International RelationsUSAPolitics - Current EventsPolitical Process - ElectionsPolitical Process - GeneralPolitical Science / GeneralAdvertising, Political

Find this book

Open Library
Book data from Open Library. Cover images courtesy of Open Library.