Lex

Browse

GenresShelvesPremiumBlog

Company

AboutJobsPartnersSell on LexAffiliates

Resources

DocsInvite FriendsFAQ

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policygeneral@lex-books.com(215) 703-8277

© 2026 LexBooks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Argument in opposition to the contest of Robert M. La Follette, Issac Stephenson, W.D. Connor and J.H. Stout, and their alternates for seats in the National Republican Convention to be held at Chicago, June 21, 1904, in place of John C. Spooner, Joseph V. Quarles, Joseph W. Babcock and Emil Baensch and their alternates, the duly elected and accredited delegates at large to said convention from the state of Wisconsin

Argument in opposition to the contest of Robert M. La Follette, Issac Stephenson, W.D. Connor and J.H. Stout, and their alternates for seats in the National Republican Convention to be held at Chicago, June 21, 1904, in place of John C. Spooner, Joseph V. Quarles, Joseph W. Babcock and Emil Baensch and their alternates, the duly elected and accredited delegates at large to said convention from the state of Wisconsin

John M. Olin, Robert M. La Follette, John C. Spooner

Details

OL Work ID
OL44499680W

Subjects

Trials, litigationElectionsPolitics and governmentRepublican National Committee (U.S.)

Find this book

Open Library
Book data from Open Library. Cover images courtesy of Open Library.