Lex

Browse

GenresShelvesPremiumBlog

Company

AboutJobsPartnersSell on LexAffiliates

Resources

DocsInvite FriendsFAQ

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policygeneral@lex-books.com(215) 703-8277

© 2026 LexBooks, Inc. All rights reserved.

Why General Motors lost and Toyota won

Why General Motors lost and Toyota won2005

Steven J. Spear

About this book

In mid-2005, Toyota is the winner and GM the loser. Toyota profits exceed those of the rest of its competitors, supported by successful new products (a broad spectrum of cars, minivans, SUVs, and trucks), new model lines (such as Lexus and Scion), new technologies (such as the hybrid drive system), and new markets for sales and production (Toyota passed Ford as the world's second-largest automaker and Daimler Chrysler as the third largest in North America). General Motors is losing share, its credit has been downgraded to junk, and declining sales revenues are coupled with increasing costs for idled and retired workers. Yet, 20 years ago, such an outcome would not have seemed inevitable. Toyota was known for reliable but otherwise boring cars, while GM had market share, brand recognition, experienced engineering and production staff, and a broad-based sales network. Furthermore, it had just created the NUMMI joint venture with Toyota, a chance to learn directly from the world's best manufacturer how to achieve high-quality output efficiently.

Details

First published
2005
OL Work ID
OL42381425W

Subjects

HistoryGeneral Motors CorporationToyota Jidōsha Kabushiki Kaisha

Find this book

Open Library
Book data from Open Library. Cover images courtesy of Open Library.