District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936)

Rules of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, adopted at the January term, 1894

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in General term, Ward H. Lamon and Chauncey F. Black, complainants, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., in eq., no. 11,238, filed July 7, 1888, John H.B. Latrobe, complainant, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., in eq., no. 11,248, filed July 13, 1888, Henry E. McKee, complainant, vs. Ellen Cochrane, et als., in eq., no. 11,262, interpleader, filed July 19, 1888

1888

Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

1884

Proceedings in the second trial of the case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montfort C. Rerdell, and Thomas J. Brady. For conspiracy ... Stenographers

1883

Star route case

1882

Proceedings of the bar of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia on the death of William H. Ward, esquire

1881

Occupation of streets and avenues in the city of Washington by stands, &c

The United States vs. John W. Dorsey et al

Indictment for conspiracy

Proceedings in the second trial of the case of the United States vs. John W. Dorsey, John R. Miner, John M. Peck, Stephen W. Dorsey, Harvey M. Vaile, Montfort C. Rerdell, and Thomas J. Brady

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. Henry E. McKee, et al., defendants, equity no. 11,238, doc. 28

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in General term, January, 1891, Ward H. Lamon, et al., complainants, vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., equity no. 11,238, doc. 28, John H.B. Latrobe vs. Henry E. McKee, et al., equity no. 11,248, doc. 28

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporat[!], plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, and J. Franklin Bell, Cuno H. Rudolph and Frederick A. Fenning, commissioners of the District of Columbia, and as such constituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendants

Star route conspiracy

Statutes, rules of court and rules of the Committee on Examination for Admission of Attorneys to practice before the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

[Uniform rules of civil procedure for the district courts of the United States and the Supreme court of the District of Columbia

The Chesapeake and Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, and Riley E. Elgen and John C. Gotwals, constituting the said Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, defendants. Equity no. 54,859

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. Henry E. McKee, John H.B. Latrobe, et al., no. 11238, equity docket 28, John H.B. Latrobe v. Henry E. McKee, et al., no. 11248, equity docket 28, Henry E. McKee, et al., v. Ellen Cochrane, John H.B. Latrobe, et al., no. 11,262, equity docket 28

Expert testimony in the case of United States vs. Guiteau

Washington railway & electric company, a corporation ... plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a corporation, and Mason M. Patrick, Harleigh H. Hartman and William B. Ladue

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, United States of America, petitioner, against George Otis Smith, respondent

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. Henry E. McKee, no. 11,238, equity doc. 28

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, a body corporate, et al., defendants

The Chesapeake & Potomac telephone company, a body corporate, plaintiff, vs. the Public utilities commission of the District of Columbia, et al., defendants

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. H.E. McKee, et al., defendants, in equity no. 11238, Doc. 28

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, certiorari, the Washington Market Company vs. the Commissioners under Act of 8th July, 1870

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

In the matter of the Farragut bounty claim

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, decree in the United States of America, v. Swift and Company and others

M.A. Dauphin vs. D.M. Key, postmaster-general, equity no. 7092

Ward H. Lamon, et al., plaintiffs, v. Henry E. McKee, et al., defendants

The Maynard coal co., plaintiff, vs. Federal trade commission, defendant

In the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, general term, 1891, Ward H. Lamon, et al., v. H.E. McKee, et al., J.H.B. Latrobe v. H.E. McKee, et al., H.E. McKee v. Ellen Cochrane, et al

Opinions of the Court on the mandamus cases

Judge Wylie's opinion in the case of Cheever vs. Cheever and Wilson, on the effect of an Indiana divorce as to parties domiciled in the District of Columbia

Rules of practice in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

Boycotting is illegal

The test-oath case

The Hicks libel case

The mechanics' lien law

Legal status of building associations

In the matter of the estate of Horatio Ames, deceased, on exceptions to the account of Charlotte L. Ames, adm'x, c.t.a

Rules of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, adopted at the January term, 1886

The Bradley Fisher difficulty